Jump to content

Foxx

Liberal Madness

Recommended Posts

 
 
Foxx
15 minutes ago, Uriel said:

 

There were no Democratic Socialists in 1941.  As some of the comments point out, these were more likely American First people - a motto of the KKK. 

:classic_laugh:

 

Drx8NbuV4AA6ucF.jpg

 

Drx70qhUUAIcNI0.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
 
Uriel
4 hours ago, Foxx said:
5 hours ago, Uriel said:

There were no Democratic Socialists in 1941.  As some of the comments point out, these were more likely American First people - a motto of the KKK. 

:classic_laugh:

 

The Socialist Party is not the same as the Democratic Socialists which came into being in the 1970's

 

https://www.dsausa.org/about-us/history/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Satyagraha

The dogs will cock their ears when the dog whistles sound. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Bart

The Dem-Socialists are turning on the Dem-Fascists. Ocasio-Cortez vs Bezos. This seems reasonable to me. It will be interesting to see how this turns out. 

 

Bezos Backlash Begins: Socialist Democrats Decry Amazon HQ2 "Burden" On NYC

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-13/bezos-backlash-begins-socialist-democrats-decry-amazon-hq2-burden-nyc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Bart

Somewhere on the net the other day, I saw a photo of ANTIFA. They were holding up a big banner that said "Become Ungovernable".

 

What if ANTIFA actually turn against both Dems and Reps? That would really be something.

 

Could this be the start of a massive civil disobedience (hopefully peaceful) along the lines if Gandhi or Thoreau?

 

A do-not-comply movement.

Edited by Bart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Satyagraha

When both parties' current leadership are corporate, then both parties would currently be Fascist.   If the citizen funded upstarts, eschewing the big donor's bribes, take over either party, then we might think this Fascist age in the one-time republic has begun to pass.

 

 

 

 

.

Edited by Satyagraha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
 
 
 
Uriel
Quote

According to the NYT, DeSantis is a “fiery conservative” while Gillum is a “Mayor”. Why isn’t Gillum labeled an “angry liberal” or a “left-wing advocate”? Why aren’t the labels a more parallel Congressman and Mayor? Nope. The R gets an ideological warning label. The D doesn’t.

 

It's always possible that's just an accurate description of the two men.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
 
 
 
 
Uriel
Quote

Archbishop of Canterbury Declares God Gender Neutral!

 

Metaphysically, that's correct.  The "father, son".... bit is just patriarchal projection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
bzpal

Next thing you know, since the term "god" is gender specific, there will be some new word to use, and "god" and "goddess" will be removed from our vocabulary. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
cowpoke
29 minutes ago, bzpal said:

Next thing you know, since the term "god" is gender specific, there will be some new word to use, and "god" and "goddess" will be removed from our vocabulary. 

 

Maybe that is why, in the original Hebrew stuff, they never used a name for God.  They never called "it" anything.  To put a name on God was forbidden.  The name "God" comes from the Germanic side of the Proto-Indo-European Language, with the same root as Good or Goth.  Theos, Deus, Dia, Duw and Zeus, are from the Greek/Celtic side of the PIE.  Jehovah comes from a Christian attempt to pronounce the unpronounceable.  Semitic languages used the unpronounceable tetragrammaton YWHW, which some Christians attempted to write as Jehovah or Yahweh.  If you actually try to pronounce YWHW, I think it sounds more like the wind than anything else, but they knew that was not it's name, just something they used to represent it.  

 

Christianity has definitely taken it further along a patriarchal path, but the Jewish were definitely there with the priesthood they developed after Moses.  In the biblical pre-Moses stuff, God is a creator, but "it" is not said to create with it's genitals, only with it's words and breath.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Satyagraha

I like terms like the, "What Is," and, "Great Mystery."   Whatever It is, it sure isn't changed a great deal by what I might think or say.  These questions are much better applied as memes for creating wars and such.    There's no mass killing like when we can get a deity on our sides.   When it comes to that point, you have to round up those wise enough to question the insanity and put them on trial to make an example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Foxx
8 hours ago, Uriel said:

 

Metaphysically, that's correct.  The "father, son".... bit is just patriarchal projection.

So, your telling me Jesus was gender neutral?

 

:classic_rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
 
Uriel
On 11/24/2018 at 4:46 PM, Foxx said:

So, your telling me Jesus was gender neutral?

 

Oh, you think Jesus was an actual person?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
 
Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Important Information

Terms of Use