* interviews Greg Hunter - Clif High interviewed - Federal Reserve & Clintons Doomed

[Romans828IsTrue]

Federal Reserve & Clintons Doomed-Clif High

 

By Greg Hunter On November 13, 2016 In Political Analysis No Comments

 

 

 

 

By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com (Early Sunday Release)

 

 

http://usawatchdog.com/federal-reserve-clintons-doomed-clif-high/#more-18106

 

 

[video=youtube_share;VoBRckWwN4g]

 

 

After the Interview:

Clif High’s predictive linguistic research also predicts the end of the Democrat Party. He mentioned the Democrat Party “would not survive past the year 2020” in his last USAWatchdog.com interview. Just last week, a story broke about how young Democrats were blaming Donna Brazile, the interim leader of the Democratic National Committee, for the 2016 election loss to Donald Trump. Here’s the link. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-11/mutinous-dnc-staffers-rage-donna-brazile-you-are-part-problem-you-let-happen

[SumDumGuy]

This portion of the interview may just be the most important Clif has ever done, IMO. Being that his accuracy of late has been astronomical, this could be it, the culmination of the long running economic meme. It begins at 15:24 and runs through 24:31

 

Debt destruction (inflation/deflation) breaks out in January as dollars come pouring back into the US (via the banks), which is really derivative destruction. To combat this, they want to impose debt upon you and I via hyper-inflation (thereby making loans easily available so you can afford the hyper-inflation, bitchez!).

 

Bank capitalization is going to change. No longer will it be based upon debt but rather, real tangible assets. As a result, watch for banks to become fierce, voracious as they attempt to stay in business. To this end, banks are going to try and seize any tangible asset they can... your house, car, boat, anything they can. Foreclosures without legal standing. There is something looming in the data that doesn't show up, some deadline where a certain capitalization has to be made by a certain time.

 

Confusion reigns.

 

 

I don't want to be Virginia Wolf but.... it may be time to be prudent.

 

 

 

As I continue to listen, if there is more that is of import to life and limb, I will post another summarization.

[SumDumGuy]

Bitchez!!

 

Entrainment tech, runs 39:43 through 41:44.

 

The Press will go because they will not be able to pump out the entrainment technology any more. Carrier signals that entrain your mind to their brainwashing. This tech was bought from a company that was run by 4 or 5 ex-CIA guys. That company is going away because it was supported by CGI. When it goes away, they won't have that support layer that brought to them that level of suspension of disbelief that allowed their message to get through. Therefor their message will run into a hard wall of realistic emotions.

[SumDumGuy]

@ 43:30

 

Confusion is going to spread far enough, that we are going to have contact with the breakaway civilization. It will be a shock to the entire social order.

 

 

 

Overall, a very good concise and to the point interview by Greg and Clif.

Clif at his best.

[1111]

Federal Reserve & Clintons Doomed-Clif High

 

By Greg Hunter On November 13, 2016 In Political Analysis No Comments

 

Thanks Romans,

 

This is Clif's best yet!

 

The interviewer needs help!

 

 

 

 

By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com (Early Sunday Release)

 

 

http://usawatchdog.com/federal-reserve-clintons-doomed-clif-high/#more-18106

 

 

[video=youtube_share;VoBRckWwN4g]

 

 

After the Interview:

Clif High’s predictive linguistic research also predicts the end of the Democrat Party. He mentioned the Democrat Party “would not survive past the year 2020” in his last USAWatchdog.com interview. Just last week, a story broke about how young Democrats were blaming Donna Brazile, the interim leader of the Democratic National Committee, for the 2016 election loss to Donald Trump. Here’s the link. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-11/mutinous-dnc-staffers-rage-donna-brazile-you-are-part-problem-you-let-happen

[bv141]

This portion of the interview may just be the most important Clif has ever done, IMO. Being that his accuracy of late has been astronomical, this could be it, the culmination of the long running economic meme. It begins at 15:24 and runs through 24:31

 

Debt destruction (inflation/deflation) breaks out in January as dollars come pouring back into the US (via the banks), which is really derivative destruction. To combat this, they want to impose debt upon you and I via hyper-inflation (thereby making loans easily available so you can afford the hyper-inflation, bitchez!).

 

Bank capitalization is going to change. No longer will it be based upon debt but rather, real tangible assets. As a result, watch for banks to become fierce, voracious as they attempt to stay in business. To this end, banks are going to try and seize any tangible asset they can... your house, car, boat, anything they can. Foreclosures without legal standing. There is something looming in the data that doesn't show up, some deadline where a certain capitalization has to be made by a certain time.

 

Confusion reigns.

 

 

I don't want to be Virginia Wolf but.... it may be time to be prudent.

 

 

 

As I continue to listen, if there is more that is of import to life and limb, I will post another summarization.

 

Foxx,

 

I want to point out one thing past on the 2009 experience with Clif.

Whenever Clif goes public in a LARGE way, and publicly discusses the data, the webbot accuracy fails spectacularly.

This happened in 2008 - 2010, and accuracy plunged.

 

What do I mean by wide scale publication: 2 Greg Hunter interviews and the X22 Spotlight report below.

 

Add this one:

[SumDumGuy]

Foxx,

 

I want to point out one thing past on the 2009 experience with Clif.

Whenever Clif goes public in a LARGE way, and publicly discusses the data, the webbot accuracy fails spectacularly.

This happened in 2008 - 2010, and accuracy plunged.

 

What do I mean by wide scale publication: 2 Greg Hunter interviews and the X22 Spotlight report below.

 

Add this one:

 

bv,

 

yes, the accuracy fell off previously. Seemingly, just after the crash of '08, which in hindsight, it was determined that Clif predicted with astonishing accuracy the timing of the beginning of the event. Which turned out to be in Iceland.

 

There is no evidence that the fall off in accuracy directly correlated to all the publicity Clif was garnering at the time. And there is no way to prove it that I am aware of, only posited, which has been done.

 

With that being said, would it be better if indeed that was the case? I dunno. The house of cards can only stay upright for so long and the longer it stays upright, the harder the fall will be when it happens. As George Ure posited way back, to paraphrase, the longer a meme is in modelspace, the larger it will be when it arrives. I do not want to see the pain and suffering that will inevitably occur when it does happen but I think, happen it must.

 

A phoenix will arise from the ashes.

[Greenmeadow]

After 2008 a lot of people who watch the fundamentals did think the economy was set up for collapse. They didn't expect TPTB to find a way to opperate around the fundamentals.

 

It sounds a bit like clif thinks the fundamentals are going to have a place again in the economy if he thinks banks are going to want assets rather than debt.

[Joy in Hawaii]

In regard to the Iceland thing, clif called it within eight minutes I think. It might have been on the nose but I think it was 8 minutes. Hmm.....eight hours is about the time difference between clif and Iceland. In any case, it was in the morning, something like 7:08 AM.

 

It was astonishingly accurate!

[SumDumGuy]

In regard to the Iceland thing, clif called it within eight minutes I think. It might have been on the nose but I think it was 8 minutes. Hmm.....eight hours is about the time difference between clif and Iceland. In any case, it was in the morning, something like 7:08 AM.

 

It was astonishingly accurate!

 

I don't know, but whatever he did to tune the 'rickety ole time machine' is working. The accuracy of late is back to that astonishing level.

[bv141]

I don't know, but whatever he did to tune the 'rickety ole time machine' is working.

 

When Cliff was giving 10 internet radio interview be report cycle (2009 - 2010), accuracy collapsed.

Cliff stopped giving interviews when Cathy got terrible ill. And it appears that Clif re-vamped the tuning. Those were 2 significant improvements to increased accuracy.

But Clif may not have addressed the 'internet radio feedback loop.'

 

Past webbot history has shown that the webbot accuracy cannot survive in a broad public discussion environment.

 

The accuracy of late is back to that astonishing level.

 

Minus Gold and Silver.

And Clif was predicting $125,000/oz gold prices on the latest Greg Hunter interview.

When Dave-O and Patents raise issues on Clif's precious metals price accuracy, there statements/concerns are NOT unfounded.

[1111]

Clif's advice in ten words or less:

 

Buy silver and Bitcoin.

[SumDumGuy]

When Cliff was giving 10 internet radio interview be report cycle (2009 - 2010), accuracy collapsed.

Cliff stopped giving interviews when Cathy got terrible ill. And it appears that Clif re-vamped the tuning. Those were 2 significant improvements to increased accuracy.

But Clif may not have addressed the 'internet radio feedback loop.'

 

Past webbot history has shown that the webbot accuracy cannot survive in a broad public discussion environment.

 

 

 

Minus Gold and Silver.

And Clif was predicting $125,000/oz gold prices on the latest Greg Hunter interview.

When Dave-O and Patents raise issues on Clif's precious metals price accuracy, there statements/concerns are NOT unfounded.

 

There is a significant gap between when Clif stopped giving interviews at the rate of 10 or so per report and his renewed accuracy rate. Again, it can not be 'proven' only posited.

 

Also, I don't know that a 'feedback loop' can be completely accounted for. Whether I read a report or listen to an interview of Clif's, I can go about talking about things I have heard or read and not mention Clif nor his bots. I'm not saying it is impossible, only that to determine whether this is organic or not is very hard at best.

 

To the claim of precious metals inaccuracy within the reports, I would have to say that it depends upon your perspective. It has been argued back and forth within the forum time and again what exactly constitutes a bot hit. Some say that the bots are merely forecasting headlines in the various media out and about, while others say that actual events on the ground, in reality should only count as a bot hit. Yet others say that it is both. Sometimes headlines are indicative of real world events and not the whim of fleeting desires. I would argue that the headlines for PM's have been more accurate than any other meme within the datasets. However, if you are looking for hard events that manifest in reality, then yes, the PM calls of Clif's interpretation of the bots are certainly open for discussion.

 

In the first scenario, the mention of a headline on a obscure website that fulfills a bot forecast can raise the matter of, 'how actionable is it'? What good is a headline fulfillment from a fear mongering website that isn't going to manifest in reality other than to create false expectations? Is it part of the macro view that is leaking from Big Consciousness and an overall look at things to come?

 

If we take a critical look at the Terra meme, we see that the rate of manifestation of actual, on the ground events is considerably higher than any other meme within the reports. To me, I attribute this to the fact that there are not really any fear mongering terra sites out there propagating false narratives. The financial meme, due to it's inherent nature, is fraught with all kinds of misinformation and the bots pick that up.

 

The 'rickety ole time machine' is nascent in its development, it is not an exact science. Though I think you will agree with me, it does have validity.

[btreehouse]

And Clif was predicting $125,000/oz gold prices on the latest Greg Hunter interview.

When Dave-O and Patents raise issues on Clif's precious metals price accuracy, there statements/concerns are NOT unfounded.

 

I am not convinced. In the x22 spotlight interview he was just using that as an example of hyperinflation that could occur. At the 37:35 through 38.10 mark he starts talking about imagine a headline Dow 125,000. But he clarifies it by saying that it only says there will be parody between the price of an oz gold and the Dow at that time. So if the Dow were at 50,000, that would mean an oz of gold would also be that amount. Whatever price the Dow might end up at is what the price of an oz of gold might be. Just my opinion of what Clif is saying.