Orange Posted October 12, 2021 Posted October 12, 2021 The world has become so polarized, that everyday common sense has gone completely out the window. Context is not able to be understood and that becomes beneficial to those who wish to push their own agenda. Case in point... Kyle Becker Tweeted the following: https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1448026074336595973 While the headline, “We are Not Going to Fire Any Employees Over This” was indeed what was said on the video except, in context. It is not entirely clear that he was speaking to the vaccine mandate and whether or not they were going to be firing anyone because of non-compliance. More so, in the greater context, he was speaking to the fact that their company would not be firing anyone for the staged sick-out. In fact, when Stephanopoulos suggests that the flight disruptions were due to resistance to the vaccine mandates, Gerry Kelly stated that there is no evidence of that. Which further underlines the fact that he was not speaking directly to a staged vaccine resistance and the implied headline. Quote
SumDumGuy Posted October 24, 2021 Posted October 24, 2021 It is not limited to, normies (oh how I detest the schoolyard playground bullying rhetoric that term implies). It has to be the strange energies from space that is causing people from all walks (even those supposedly enlightened) to not being able to entertain perspectives that dissent from what their cognitive biases trap them into. It is prevalent everywhere. https://mobile.twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1452294223676465159 Quote
SumDumGuy Posted November 1, 2021 Posted November 1, 2021 Minor point of order. https://twitter.com/clif_high/status/1455235027147493379 Here is the a Tweet from that author explaining why he deleted it. Again, it is a minor point of order but just the same, it is a point of order. Context and complete truth is important in these days. Without it, one *might be accused of pushing an agenda. https://twitter.com/Dierenbach/status/1437898158521061383 Quote
SumDumGuy Posted December 14, 2021 Posted December 14, 2021 I really wish Clif would make an attempt to at the very least to try and vet these things before he re-Tweets them. I'm going to have to call bullshit on this. https://twitter.com/clif_high/status/1470852832513327109 Quote
SumDumGuy Posted December 15, 2021 Posted December 15, 2021 4 hours later Clif attempts to bend his previous narrative? https://twitter.com/clif_high/status/1470914104202182656 Quote
SumDumGuy Posted December 16, 2021 Posted December 16, 2021 Today, Clif retweets a video from 2019. https://twitter.com/FX2trot/status/1471250811019792384 Quote
Orange Posted December 19, 2021 Author Posted December 19, 2021 A keyboard Rambo. Social engineering towards a certain proclivity one may have. Quote
SumDumGuy Posted December 30, 2021 Posted December 30, 2021 https://twitter.com/moontreeco/status/1476324151531028481 Quote
SumDumGuy Posted January 31, 2022 Posted January 31, 2022 Nothing to see here. Just Clif trying to force another square peg into a round hole. It is beyond me why he does shit like this. It gives us idiots a bad name. Quote
SumDumGuy Posted February 4, 2022 Posted February 4, 2022 A giant wall of artifacts of stitched images... the Woo is also fooled quite easily it would appear... Quote
SumDumGuy Posted February 4, 2022 Posted February 4, 2022 Clif retweeted an article by Kyle Becker. The problem with the article, is that it entire argument is destroyed by one sentence in the paper, that it relies on for the, entire article. That being, "Study limitations include lack of direct neutralization assays, the fact that antibody levels alone do not directly equate to immunity,4,6 the cross-sectional study design, a convenience sample with an unknown degree of selection bias due to public recruitment, self-reported COVID-19 test results, the study population being largely White and healthy, and lack of information on breakthrough infections." Emphasis mine. If you are going to base an entire article on what is contained within a medical paper, and maybe it's just me, but I think one would be wise to heed what the entire paper says. And not cherry pick portions of it because it fits a narrative one desires. For those who rue against the covid narrative as being false information, to do essentially the same thing is not helping one person. If you want to help, anyone, build your foundation upon rock-solid information and conclusions of said information. Otherwise you are just doing what you accuse them of doing, and that my friend, makes you one in the same. Quote
anon coward Posted February 5, 2022 Posted February 5, 2022 On 2/4/2022 at 11:57 AM, Foxx said: A giant wall of artifacts of stitched images... the Woo is also fooled quite easily it would appear... it that wall real - or photoshopped? SumDumGuy 1 Quote
SumDumGuy Posted February 5, 2022 Posted February 5, 2022 4 hours ago, anon coward said: it that wall real - or photoshopped? It is more than likely the result of a bad job of 'stitching' images together. If you read through the comments to that Tweet, another points out that that same wall is shown as running through Siberia, yet no one has seen it there. One would think Cilf is smarter than this, but he does seem to be easily duped in some regards. anon coward 1 Quote
Recommended Posts